Skip to content

Research

I research how to make language models more reliable when their answers affect real decisions.

A confident hallucination can matter far beyond a bad answer.

As AI moves into everyday products and high-stakes domains such as finance and payments, hallucination and overconfidence become practical reliability problems, not just benchmark failures.

I study how models behave under uncertainty, how post-training changes that behaviour, and whether undesirable changes can be predicted, detected and selectively controlled.

Research interests

  • Reliable language models

    How to make model behaviour dependable when people rely on it.

  • Hallucination

    Why models produce convincing answers that can mislead people.

  • Abstention

    When a model should stop, defer, or simply say “I don’t know”.

  • Post-training behaviour

    How training changes behaviour beyond what developers intended.

  • Safety

    How useful capabilities can become harmful in the wrong context.

  • Knowledge and reasoning

    Why models can learn something and still make consequential mistakes.

Selected first author publications

  1. Twin Worlds: Equivariance-Based Abstention for Evidence-Grounded Reasoning

    Vy Nguyen, Ziqi Xu, Jeffrey Chan, Estrid He, Feng Xia, Renqiang Luo, Erik Cambria, Xiuzhen Zhang

    Accepted to EMNLP · 2026 · A* conference

    A model can be confident and still be wrong because its memory reflects an older world.

    arXiv ↗

  2. Hallucinate Less by Thinking More: Aspect-Based Causal Abstention for Large Language Models

    Vy Nguyen, Ziqi Xu, Jeffrey Chan, Estrid He, Feng Xia, Xiuzhen Zhang

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2026 · A* conference

    When a question feels familiar, a model jumps to the first reading that fits. I bring the other readings back before it commits.

    Paper ↗arXiv ↗

  3. Bootstrap Wayfinding Questions to Elicit Emotion Shift Reasoning with Large Language Models

    Vy Nguyen, Xiuzhen Zhang, Feng Xia

    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · 2026 · Q1 journal

    When emotion changes in a conversation, the question is what caused the change, not what each sentence felt. I start from that change and reason towards its cause.

    Paper ↗

  4. Emotion Flip Reasoning via Stacked Instruction Finetuning of LLMs

    Vy Nguyen, Xiuzhen Zhang

    Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024) · 2024

    Naming the trigger in one prediction hides the judgments that identify it. I train those judgments in steps.

    Paper ↗

A more complete list is on Google Scholar.